What consequence did some Supreme Court decisions have for doctors who prescribed maintenance doses to addicts?

What consequence did some Supreme Court decisions have for doctors who prescribed maintenance doses to addicts?

• A. They gained a grant
• B. They were jailed
• C. They received promotions
• D. They became exempt from regulation

Answer: (B)

The main idea is that doctors who prescribed maintenance doses to addicts faced criminal penalties under narcotics laws. Early Supreme Court decisions treated providing ongoing, long‑term doses as facilitating addiction or distributing controlled substances, which could be prosecuted. As a result, some physicians were jailed for such practices, reflecting a punitive stance toward maintenance treatment in that era. The other options don’t fit the legal reality of those decisions, which did not grant grants, promotions, or exemptions from regulation.

The main idea is that doctors who prescribed maintenance doses to addicts faced criminal penalties under narcotics laws. Early Supreme Court decisions treated providing ongoing, long‑term doses as facilitating addiction or distributing controlled substances, which could be prosecuted. As a result, some physicians were jailed for such practices, reflecting a punitive stance toward maintenance treatment in that era. The other options don’t fit the legal reality of those decisions, which did not grant grants, promotions, or exemptions from regulation.